后殖民主义批判视角下的美国涉华事实核查机构议题选择

中图分类号：G212;D822 文献标识码：A 文章编号：2095-6916（2026）05-0169-04

A Postcolonial Critique of Agenda Selection in U.S. Fact-Checking Institutions’ Coverage of China

Xia Xinyao1Huang Gelin² （1.School of Humanities；2.Research Center for Public Opinion and Network Information Security， Wenzhou University，Wenzhou 325000）

Abstract：Basedonpostcolonalcrticaltheory，thisstudyconductsacontentanalysisof2O9China-relatedfact-checkingreports publishedbetween2Oand025bytomajorU.S.fact-checkingistitutios，namelySnopesandPolitiFact，torevealstructuralbiases intheiragendaselectio.FistChaelateddisiforationisategorzedites“hinTeatTory，“ChiaClasTh ry”，“OrientalistDiscourse”，“NewLandscapesofChina’sDevelopment”，“ChinesePolicalRumors”，and“China’sEthnicIssues”. Statistical analysis shows that the proportions of checks on“China Threat Theory”bythetwo institutions reach 53.5%， 81.2% ，and 39. 3% respectively，whilecheckson“ChinaCollpseTheory”，“PoliticalRumors”，and“EthnicIsues”arescarce，presentingaparadoxof “highatento-lwoverageTisselectivebiasisdrivenbothbypiticalconicfactors（e.g，theInteatioalFactCcking Network'srelianceonfundingfromtheU.S.DeparmntofState）andytheinterplayofinerentpostcoloial“othering”inWestediscourse and platform trafic algorithms.

Keywords：postcolonial critique； fact-checking；selective bias； China-related disinformation;agenda seting

随着数字技术的不断发展，虚假信息制作愈发简单，传播量剧增，事实核查作为遏制虚假信息的重要手段，渐受中西方重视。（剩余5592字）