关于在我国建立替代性争议解决机制的研究

  • 打印
  • 收藏
收藏成功

Abstract:Objective]Toaddress thehighcostsandlongcyclesoftraditionaljudiciallitigationinconsumerdisputeresolution, as wellas challenges likecross-borderrights protectionandsmall-value,high-frequencydisputes under newconsumption models,this study exploresconstructingalocalizedAlternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)mechanism to enhanceconsumer rights protectionefciencyandoptimizemarket governance.[Methods]Thestudyanalyzes theurgencyofreformingconsumer disputeresolutionmechanismsandclarifies thepositioningof theADRwithintheconsumer disputeresolutionframework. [Results]Theinstitutional frameworkisdesignedfromtwoaspects:legislativeproposalsandspecificimplementationplans, coveringcoreeementssuchasthepositioningofteADR,sopefapplication,institutioaloperations,proceduralond financialsupport.Conclusion]AlocalizedADRmechanismcanefectivelycomplementraditionaldisputeresolutionmodels, providing convenientandaffordablerelief channels forconsumers,reducing litigation costs,improving disputeresolution efficiency,optimizing administrative resources,and promoting consumer market fairnessand economic growth.

Keywords:ADR;consumers;dispute resolution

0 引言

在推动消费促进经济增长和维护消费者权益的过程中,建立高效的争议解决机制尤为重要。(剩余7137字)

monitor
客服机器人