“无效认罪”的理论解构、生成机理与防范策略

中图分类号：G924．1 文献标志码：A

Abstract： Against the backdrop of the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law，this study employs case analysis and data analysis to uncover instances of invalid confessons stemming from various causes， including false or coerced confessons，a lack of legal knowledge， inadequate legal aid，as well as prosecutorial or judicial misconduct. "Invalid confessons" infringe the defendant's legal rights and have a negative impact on the justice and eficiency of the judiciary. To effectively prevent "invalid confessions" and associate issues，the folowing systemic measures should be implemented： building an open database of "invalid confession" cases，deepening the differentiated application of the leniency-and-severity policy in plea-based cases，reforming performance evaluation and eror-tolerance mechanisms within judicial organs， enhancing the effectiveness of duty lawyers' participation，and strengthening the court's evidence review mechanism within the confession system. These source-level interventions willreduce the occurrence of invalid confessions while safeguarding judicial fairness and eficiency. Concurrently， they will improve institutional design，elevate judicial professionalism，and reinforce oversight mechanisms. This ongoing optimization of the confession system will enhance the professional of judicial work and contribute actively to building a more just， efficient，and authoritative socialist judicial system.

Key words： confession system； invalid confession; voluntariness; legality; judicial review

“无效认罪”，特指因缺乏真实性或自愿性基础，致使司法裁判丧失正当性的认罪表示。（剩余13871字）