中医药治疗缺血性心肌病系统评价/Meta分析的方法学与报告质量评价

  • 打印
  • 收藏
收藏成功


打开文本图片集

AbstractObjective:Toevaluatethemethodologicalandreportingqualityofsystematicreviews/Meta-analysesontraditionalChinese medicineforischemiccardiomyopathy(ICM).Metods:TworesearchersindependentysearchedtheChinaNationalKnowledge Infrastructure(CNKl),theCineseBiomedicalLiteratureDatabase(CBM),WanFangDatatheCinesecienceandTechnologJoual Database(VIP),ubMed,andtheedscapeRforeignmedicalinformationplatform.ChineseandEngishliteratureoeatic reviews/Mta-analysesofradionalChinesemedicinefortreatmentofICMwerecolectedfromtheestablismentofdatabasetoOctober 31,2023.TheAMSTARscaleand the PRISMA 2020scale wereusedtoconduct methodologicalandreportingqualty evaluations respectivelyesus:Aotalof1ematicevieetaanalysiteraturesreiudeding1iteraturesined literatures in English.The average score of the AMSTAR scale was (7.71±1.42) with the scores for Chinese and English literatures being (20号 (7.30±1.16) and (9.75±0.35) respectively.In the evaluation results of the AMSTAR scale,two English literatures registered the prospectiveresearchprotocolandclearlystatedtherelevantconflictsofinterest.IntheAMSTARscaleevaluationresults,twEnglish literaturesregisterdtheprospectivestudyprotocolandclealystatedtherelevantcofictsofinterestTeitmswitlwersoesinthe Chineseliteraturemainlyincludedwhethertoprovidethepreliminarydesignplan,whethertoprovidealistofresearchliteraturefor inclusionandelusiondthtoakeaofitfinteeststatementoneoftiraturesprovdedalistofddaatin literatureNoneofte0includedCineseieratureswereighquaitywiththewormediumqualitycategoryTwoEngisiteature were highquality.Theaverage PRiSMA 2020 scorewas( 19.92±3.42) ,while the scores for the Chinese and English literatureswere (18.95±2.82) and (24.75±1.06) respectively.The Chinese literatures scored lower primarily on items related to search strategies, credityoli reviews/Meta-analysesontraditionalChinesemedicineforICMexhibitedissuessuchaslackingforward-lkingresearchdesign schemesitaedtestifdsfitifisl lowerthanthatofEngishliteratures.Systematicreviews/Meta-analysesontraditionalChinesemedicineforICMshouldcomplywiththe requirementsofAMSTARandPRISMA2020scalesandfomhigh-quaitysystematicreviews/Meta-analysestoprovidehighquality evidence forclinical practice.

Keywordsischemiccardiomyopathy;traditionaChinesemedicine;systematicreviewsMeta-analyses;methodologyqualtvaluation

冠心病是全球死亡的主要原因之一[1]。(剩余12619字)

monitor